07 September 2010

if we must be so warlike, could we at least focus it on the real enemy?

[click image]

.

Indeed, good sir, there are very many, a big majority, of rational men who have no wish to attack Iran, but there are a few, a despicably powerful few, who can make it happen anyway.

There was a piece of total fabrication in the NYT yesterday that I didn't have the strength to bring up and debunk bit by bit, the real POINT being only that the NYT is doing precisely what it did with the run up to the Iraq invasion, only not using Judy Miller's byline this time. There's one visitor to this blog who thinks the whole bit with Iran is only saber rattling, and indeed I have had to take refuge in that thought quite a few times, but what it really is is our government and other servants of the controllers incessantly trying to create a casus belli that could turn the world population in favor of attacking Iran.

As I've said before, and was confirmed in the interview I linked yesterday, there is the small matter of the missing nuke that in a pinch may yet be made to serve, depending on the pressure to get this done. I saw yesterday, too, that there were about five bits of "news" aimed again specifically at dehumanizing Iranians, especially the Iranian regime, to the point where it might be okay with us to nuke them to save them from all that.

So today I find this Reuters piece and I'm simply leaving out all the paragraphs in it that were lies and convenient allusions to facts not in evidence, just sticking to their reportage on the Russian official's material. It's more informative and less dangerous this way.
Russian official: U.S. hindering resumption of talks with Iran

The comments, made to a discussion group of Russia experts, appeared aimed at nudging Washington towards restarting stalled UN-backed talks to provide Iran with nuclear fuel for a Tehran research reactor.

By Reuters

A senior Russian government official said on Monday that the United States was hindering the resumption of talks with Iran on a fuel swap deal aimed at easing concern over the Islamic Republic's nuclear ambitions.

The comments, made to a discussion group of Russia experts, appeared aimed at nudging Washington towards restarting stalled UN-backed talks to provide Iran with nuclear fuel for a Tehran research reactor.

"I am concerned by the fact that the United States slowed down the process," the senior government official told the Valdai group of Russia experts when asked about the fuel deal.

The official spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the issue.

... the Russian official said Western demands that Iran give up making low enriched uranium were futile and that major powers should instead focus on preventing Tehran getting fuel that could be used for a nuclear bomb.

"It is not realistic that Iran will give up the enrichment up to four percent," the official said. "The international community should focus on preventing the further enrichment to 20 percent."

... Russia welcomed a statement last month by Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who said work to make higher-grade uranium would stop if it got assurances on nuclear fuel supplies for the Tehran research reactor.

At that time, Russia also called for a meeting as soon as possible to discuss such supplies.

... The Russian official said Moscow did not want Tehran to have nuclear weapons but warned that rash decisions over Iran could lead to a tragedy for the Middle East.

...Russia voted for a UN Council sanctions resolution against Iran in June but Moscow has criticised tougher additional sanctions imposed by the United States and the European Union.

The Russian official said the tougher unilateral sanctions imposed by Washington and Brussels were unacceptable.

"If we agreed on something we shall not allow any step to the left or right of the basic document," the official said.
We have PERFECTLY CLEARLY refused to accept every acceptance of our offers to Iran to settle this matter peacefully, and there's only ONE reason for that. The powers that be don't want the matter settled. They want to use it as an excuse to attack Iran, and they are not giving up mindfucking us, keeping the masses stupid enough so that a false flag will work like a charm.

.
love, 99
.

4 comments:

  1. Yes.

    Or just Wall Street and City of London... probably good enough.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The MSM all networks even BBC are giving major coverage to that koran burner guy. Now they're showing Afghans demonstrating about it. WAY too much attention for a self-proclaimed pastor of a so-called church with only fifty followers. Something may be afoot.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Yes, that was one of the dehumanizing stories I was mentioning.

    They are beating the drums for war. Most of the truth teller contingent in the financial sector are predicting it. They're also milking the stoning of the unfaithful wife thing for everything it's worth everywhere you look.

    Zounds, Sherlock, I think yer onto something.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.