10 October 2010

thank heavens

[right click image, mp3, one hour and HERE for Part 2, also one hour]

.

My favorite space lizard expert has been missing in action too long and I just found, against numerous intimations of impending doom, that he's still happening.

.

After listening to this, I suppose now is an okay time to tell you that, after a great deal of thought, and a rather rude smack in the teeth by Richard Gage [HERE at 1:45] via one of his increasingly urgent newsletters and action appeals, something I have been trying to convince myself was just a sloppy mistake under pressure of a live interview, I have gone from merely willing to assume the agnostic stance to hear people with diverging views to my view now diverging.

Dr. Jones has the dubious record of having come out with a devastating limited hangout on the matter of cold fusion, and for all the noise and activism and ardent appeals from the prime movers in the Truth Movement, none of them has made a move to assert this stuff through legal channels, done anything more than appeal to the public. This "error" by Richard Gage is just not palatable to me, try as I might to give him the benefit of the doubt. That was a question to which there is a pat, an airtight pat, answer and I think he has even used it in the past; to wit: office fires do not collapse OR powderize OR topple steel buildings. Gage has stood in front of the world showing slide after slide of office fire damage to still utterly upright, if gutted, towering steel infernos. WHY did he say that?

Having spent many, many, many hours listening with minute attention to anything I can find on the matter of torsion physics and having had some extremely vexing questions answered by Judy Wood's mountains of collected evidence, I don't think I can even go back to the standard Truther's position on the matter. I might not even be able to inch back to plain agnosticism anymore... too much of Einstein's music and too loud to ignore for the sake of consensus. Reality is not consensual. It simply is.

The one part that seems to try to attach itself to her camp, that I have not heard her assert, is the "no planes" theory, and while I understand people's hesitation about the light material of the planes not being able to make plane-shaped holes in the towers, I don't think that applies at the speeds we're talking about. So I think the planes DID hit the buildings, even though, yes, all the people who say they saw them could just have thought they saw them, with the idea already firmly implanted in everyone's heads, and the videos could have been doctored... yadda, yadda, yadda. That still seems utterly too fantastic and utterly unnecessary. They may or may not have been the planes nearly everyone believes they were, but I still think they were planes.

Whatever. The Truther guys have not been acting like citizens bent on truth. They have been acting like citizens bent on publicizing a version of truth. Whereas, Judy Wood has been doggedly compiling outright astonishing amounts of evidence and it's all pointing at weaponized torsion physics. And this fits much better with Tarpley's reporting on the matter as well. AND she has sued NIST for their piece of shit report. She has taken FAR more heat from the powers that be than any of the prime movers in the CD crowd, even though she is far less popular than they are... whatever could that mean?

So. I have been struggling with how to put this for five days, and might have gone on struggling for X more days had it not been for this interview landing in my lap tonight. I don't know how many of you have the time to put into it, and a bunch of the materials I have linked over the months to help you come up to speed on the torsion physics thing have been ripped down from YouTube. I have done my best to replace them, but I don't even know if the replacements are still standing. I can only say that I have been riveted to stuff and invested many, many, many hours on it, and based on these things, I can't but say I think the "disinfo agents" everyone is so paranoid about are the ones who made everyone paranoid about "disinfo agents" to begin with.

We seem to have proven nanothermite exists in large quantities in the dust. That does not mean that the nanothermite caused the damage we saw. It may have helped cause it. There may have been a large amount of it stored in one of the buildings. Or it may not have been there at all... only in the samples given to certain scientists. It makes no difference.

That may have been a feature of the great thought experiment of just hearing people without prejudice I forgot to mention. If you listen to them in good faith, there is a possibility they will change your mind.

.

And, yeah, this Tsarion character is much better when he's not ranting. How odd that I started out hearing him in a bunch of interviews where he was so angry and going so fast and showing how little he gets to speak with people conversant in his subjects... at least five interviews, probably more, before I got to hear him when he's more relaxed, not ranting, not so pissed off you almost can't hear him at all. Of course, when you realize some of the things he's realized, very much tends to piss you off.

HINT:

This seriously applies to the present discussion....

.

It took some digging, but THIS should go a long way toward explaining that otherwise unfathomable commercial at the end of the Tsarion playlist.... This has been bugging me for the better part of a day now, and I found the thing that lets the guy in the main body of the interview be the same one who then comes on and appears to be selling balderdash to the credulous. Since he has seen correctly into so much, it doesn't follow that such a one would be selling this stuff, but for all any of us truly knows, he may have seen also correctly into the age old problem with "divination". I don't know if I will pursue it to find out, or just leave it at this, but it is at least a comfort to me that, right or wrong, he is in this stuff in good faith.

.
love, 99
.

5 comments:

  1. Murder Inc. learned their lesson from Vietnam as shown in one of your previous entries. They
    bought the media to keep their dirty little secrets in the dark, and the masses who refuse to turn off the T.V. stay hypnotized. There's a very good picture (click to enlarge) on that site that shows the money trail.

    They have used DEWs in Iraq!!

    When the inevitable financial holocaust comes about and money is no longer the aphrodisiac it is today, then and only then will the sleepers make the concerted effort to grab a pitchfork and join in on the crusade.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Bless you for your comment and your links, Mister North. I have seen before about the DEWs and "Active Denial" systems in play, and they are definitely hints, but the directed energy that did 9/11, at least the towers, is a whole different can of worms. "Makes nukes look like firecrackers." It appears to have been the cause of a number of bad earthquakes, and I only think this because enough really smart people, with the best minds around to advise them, have said so too. I'm not just relying on Farrell, though he has done the best job of explaining it... to us....

    The science for it, the theory with all the math, came out in the 1920s and flopped. There are two reasons for theories flopping: [1] they're wrong; and [2] the big boys want them secret. It's like the cold fusion thing Jones killed decades ago. It works, they were onto something, college kids can tell you it works... some even have done their doctoral work on it... but the public is oblivious, still think it was killed all those years ago. Einstein was onto it, but retracted his paper on it suddenly, and there can be only those same two reasons for that.

    After the lesson of Tesla, how can we doubt that second reason has been in play at certain junctures?

    The other really convincing part for me is the fact that physics, the whole discipline, has dead-ended, as Farrell states. This was a comment on something I had already figured out, years ago. Its going-nowhere-ness. In the midst of all those popular books about quantum physics, and even the good old Chaos Theory, I noticed that they were all just hotdogging with abstruseness, not going anywhere, just really hip to be conversant in. High idiocy.

    And, yeah, I don't think I would hang on posting wakeup calls here if I had better material here in my poverty. My poverty didn't used to be able to stultify me like this, but poverty has picked up a whole solar system of new attributes in recent years. It hasn't completely stopped me, but close. I find myself too often wishing for relief from someone who has some money, but I couldn't take it from at least 99.9% of the people who have it. So that's just me letting off steam... and not even THIS makes me give a shit about the stuff.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Einstein was onto the torsion physics.

    The kids are onto the cold fusion.

    I really fucked up making that clear above. Sorry.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I think I get it!

    (The good stuff starts on page 106, gets real good on page 112, outstanding on page 114)

    ReplyDelete
  5. Oooooooo! THANKS FOR THAT LINKY! Yuuuum. :o]

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.