01 December 2010

oh, definitely bogus, planted, state department cables, suuuure

[click image]

.

Someone mentioned how good propaganda is always mixed in with a healthy portion of truth to give itself more credibility. Well, then, they've seriously outdone themselves this time....

.

HUNNERTS OF WIKILEAKS MIRRORS....

.
love, 99
.

8 comments:

  1. Sure cherry pick an item and use it to say the whole thing is spot on...and then you stick it under "dont be an idiot" to boot..grrrrrrrrrr.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I'm not doing that!

    I've been linking a bunch of examples, and plan to continue. Is there some other mode of making my point that would satisfy you?

    I'm pretty freaked that the people out there I felt best equipped to deal with the inevitable mindfuck from the powers that be are instead focussed on suspecting the most trustworthy actor in the entire ordeal. I'm way, way upset that people aren't reading these releases and seeing how they put the lie to the supposed nefarious motives of Julian Assange. So I'm bringing them up, adding inspiration to READ them instead of falling for the smears from people who don't want us dealing with a full deck....

    ReplyDelete
  3. I'm not impugning the sentiment, and I'm not call THAT idiocy. I'm saying don't fall for the snow job because THAT is idiotic.

    I'm sorry if you were offended by it. I meant no offense. In fact, I love your input, even when I disagree.

    ReplyDelete
  4. All Im saying is it would be very easy to "leak" false information into this. As much as I would love to finally have a source of information that I feel I can fully trust, I am still on guard as to what is presented here. Yes these cables look 100% genuine and I hope they all are. And call it my pet issue but anyone that unnecessarily disses 911 truth when it is so blatantly obvious is someone I have to be suspicious of. Unless they are just stupid and Assange is not that.

    ReplyDelete
  5. No worries, I still love ya.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I have seen too many people who want/need to be taken seriously by the mainstream find it imperative to dis 9/11 truth in order to avoid being marginalized, completely unjustly, out of any ability to be effective in their work. Some of them are personal heroes either long standing or brand new. I don't like it either. In fact, I revile it. But I have been forced to admit that is the ONLY way anyone who wants to bring controversy into the light of day has a chance. Yes. The only way is to gratuitously take a swipe at 9/11 truth. That tells all MSM you are trustworthy immediately. It's code for DON'T WORRY, I'M JUST AS BIG A BOOB AS YOU ARE AND WON'T TAKE YOUR PANTS DOWN IN FRONT OF THE WORLD. If they were not all so ashamed of themselves for this, then guys like Assange and Palast and Hersh, etc., wouldn't have to do this.

    I know they don't MEAN it. I know they consciously cede that in order to be HEARD at all on other really important stuff.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I know they consciously cede that in order to be HEARD at all on other really important stuff.

    And that totally sucks!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Yes, yes, it most seriously does suck. I hate it. I just find I can't blame them. I certainly WOULD, but my reality jones keeps me back.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.