the polar bears are really drowning

Why is there one war on this planet when the global emergency is this dire? People tell me it is because plutocrats will not ever invest money when they can be looting treasuries unimpeded, even if the profits from their investments would be huge and the planet itself saved for our continued habitation. I'm asking, over and over and over, how in the name of all that is holy can anyone -- even a psychopath -- make such a stupid choice. But they seem to feel the opportunity to kill off half the world population, and then enslave another large chunk while they're about it, is a good enough gamble on the recuperative powers of our home planet. I'm all for population reduction, and a drastic one, but there is absolutely no need to do it this way. They're shooting for a utopia for greedy, vain, slaveholders, and I'm stumping for a utopia for all beings.

This really boils down to weighing the evils of birth control over the evils of slaughtering outright, or torturing and starving poor people to death. It's clear which evil is the lesser in the minds of the power movers of the world. Pfeh, who knows? Maybe the gene pool is better-served their way.

This would be the right wing and the left wing of the third millennium we're talking about here, and I'm griping about the pusillanimity and self-satisfaction of the monster bloggers because of this. Just keep letting them have, get and keep all the power -- even to the point of co-opting your intelligence -- while you hide the truth from yourself, and the liberalism of the third millennium will end up even weaker and more futile than it was in the second.