[click image, audio, hour and fifteen minutes, mp3 here].
Peter B. Collins interviews Gordon Duff of Veteran's Today. I never realized Duff was this heavily connected, thought he was a little crazy about the Israeli thing, however right on he usually is on the subject. You better listen to this. You better listen to this. I'm sorry, but you better listen to this.
Duff tells us in this interview that he received this image of the original 9/11 hit on the Pentagon from the Canadian military. ===>When I first saw the hole, it was a lot larger, but still MUCH smaller than an airliner impact could possibly be, but I didn't see it until a few minutes after it was first reported on tv, and then a few minutes later, of course, the roof caved in. I did hear the reporter saying the hole was much too small for an airliner and that there was no debris that could be attributed to one. I can't verify this image is of the Pentagon. The windows look wrong. The firefighter looks wrong.
Anyway, I think you better listen to this.
.
UPDATE:
Turns out the image was from damage to an inner ring, not the outside of the building. And there are numerous sources for this image all over the tubes. So I have to listen again to hear what Duff is claiming, but this wasn't that hard to trace down. Still, it's ridiculous. There is NOTHING LIKE crashed airliner debris in this image. Bubkes. No airliner, no airplane, hit the Pentagon. Period.
.
Ya, sure, the nose of an airplane, consisting of light gauge aluminum framework and skin, punched its way through two concrete walls, remaining intact enough to further punch its way cleanly through this third wall, ya, sure!
ReplyDeleteAnd if my memory serves me correctly it also went through the wall beyond the one in the photo!
I think THIS was the C ring shot, which would have been the deepest of them... I think. I've been hassling with Duff over his witless smear of Assange, but don't think I'm going to bother taking issue with him on the 9/11 thing. Fucking LAME to talk to Peter as though THIS was the original hole, letting listeners believe he meant the hole on the outside of the building... and then the crap about getting it from the Canadian military... when, yes, maybe he did, but THEY would have gotten it from any of a bunch of places all over the web... including from our government.
ReplyDeleteThe guy has a hard on for Israel and it has made him INCAPABLE of prosecuting them with any FACTS. All his work, whether it's his intent or not, goes to FURTHER CONFUSING PEOPLE. He's a hot-headed jackass.
The windows DO look right for the C ring, but not for the outermost one. For one thing the windows are much lower to the ground on the outside ring. So, anyway, for sure the guy's, at the very least, SO anti-Israel that he cannot be trusted to give cogent and cogently-sourced material, but he also might just be serving as a magnet for their enemies... which SERVES them more than displeases them, let alone threatens them.
ReplyDeleteOK,
ReplyDeleteAfter viewing the debunker link I see that it in fact only penetrated two walls since the rings don't extend all the way to the ground.
So...
the nose of an airplane, consisting of light gauge aluminum framework and skin, punched its way through one concrete wall then traveled along the ground for 220 feet taking out interior light framed walls and numerous columns which were supporting the exterior walls of the upper floors all the time remaining intact enough to further punch its way cleanly through this second concrete wall wall, ya, sure!
Well, if the C ring isn't the one that goes all the way to the ground, WTF is the "no parking" sign doing on the wall next to the hole?
ReplyDeleteLook at the debunker link I posted - it has an illustration. The first floor goes from the exterior wall to the far wall of the C ring which does go all the way to the ground. The spaces which form the rings don't begin until above the first floor - or another way to look at it is that there is a roof above the first floor in between the rings. The exterior walls of the rings do not go all the way to the ground between the exterior wall where the object entered and where it exited as shown in the photo.
ReplyDeleteJust noticed:
ReplyDeleteI've never in my life lowered myself to competing in circumlocution with a woman.
LMAO
Sheesh. Took you long enough! :-P
ReplyDeleteI did look at yer debunking link and could barely grok what they were putting out there, except for the roofs lower in the rings except one. I don't care to pay more attention to this because I already KNOW what happened, and have now already shown myself this Gordon Duff guy is completely untrustworthy.