14 January 2011

i guess i gotta keep him under 'out there'

[click image — Phil, I think it's from the summer of 2007.]

.

Because, even though he doesn't sound the least out there to me, and in fact pops up with a lot of in here stuff, almost anyone who clinks on the links is bound to find this stuff way out there. I have to not kid myself about this. He just dissed me darn hard for trying to talk sense into you, and... he has a point the size of the planet....

.
love, 99
.

16 comments:

  1. Why do I feel bad requesting you to add dates now? Go ahead drop them, I feel stupid (and a bit controlling) now for even suggesting it in the first place.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Well, it's good to know for people trying to keep track of the evolution of his thinking, which I definitely am, and so I think it was nice of you to bring it up. It's just sometimes hard or impossible to track down and one has to try to place it by listening to what current events they might be talking about in the interview. But hell. It's all free and THAT is huge. It's very expensive to try to keep up with these guys via their books and DVDs.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Indeed it's tough to find which to tap into, since there seems to be different versions published out there different lengths, different publishers, etc. Bottom line is the information is important. You are really the only other one that I know who even knows about Tsarion. Let alone actually listens. He sucked me in when he was talking about symbology. I have studied and used talismans, amulets since around the mid 80's, so I was onto this early on actually. But he expanded it somewhat. I already knew the part about churches building on top of old sites, as I learned about "stealing back" at the same time.

    ~p

    ReplyDelete
  4. Tsarion fits right into my belief system, filling voids with things which fit right in. Organized religion can't do that, because it isn't reality based. I know certain things, so when someone comes along and say's bla bla bla, I know it's crap. On the other hand when someone comes along and can provide reality based information which fits with myth and flows with the universe, I can't really explain it other than I know when it's right, and when it isn't right is when I start challenging it.

    ~p

    ReplyDelete
  5. I have been extremely glad to have found him. He talks like my kind of people talk. I have been trying hard not to die of self-pity for the lack of it, and so even though I don't get to interact with him, at LEAST I can listen. There are a couple spots where I don't think he's seen all the way into something, and maybe one where there is vestigial attitude coloring his thinking, but, crikey, it's IMPORTANT to have people right in your stream and I can't begin to express how hard those are for me to find.

    ReplyDelete
  6. It took me a while to get past his problem with using sounds-like words where the real ones belong so often, but after thinking about it, it's probably because he does this stuff all alone, knows most of his English from reading, fools around with word roots and forms for a living, and so the rap gets a little psychedelic in spots.

    ReplyDelete
  7. There are some other great interviews here. One of them starts out with someone else, but it's only about the first quarter of the mp3.

    ReplyDelete
  8. even though I don't get to interact with him, at LEAST I can listen //

    Yeah I did something similar in the 80's I took a course in the craft of the wise. Which explains why I always whip out the ABCDEF. This has helped me though my years to cut through the BS. I tune in to native Americans better than I do regular Americans for obvious reasons. While the gods, the myths, the rituals might be different, there are many truth's which match right up with my own.

    ReplyDelete
  9. It having been once a global civilization, that only follows. I don't think, though I don't know, the old "globalization" was as awful as the new one —the new world order—threatens to be.

    ReplyDelete
  10. If your treating people like fertilizer, what difference is there really in the big picture?

    I don't know the answer either, but I do know that if I had time to hone my evil skills I would be a much worse/stronger/more evil/more to the point opponent than any previous incarnation before. On the other hand, has the physics changed since then? I don't think so. It maybe equal.

    ~p

    ReplyDelete
  11. And yet then again, if you have people with knowledge which is dangerous and they exploit it against you how can you stop it?

    A: you destroy it.

    No matter how smart you are, if your dead, your powerless in this world.

    ReplyDelete
  12. That has something to do with why I keep trying to get people to listen to him... but they don't think it's their own skin at risk, or plain don't want to know, so don't bother to save OTHERS from being turned into fertilizer by evil fucks funded by us....

    ReplyDelete
  13. part of it is this -imo

    Most people in the usa are Christian or Christian based belief system. Such a belief system, stops people from looking outside of the single book, because of fear.

    The fear is in the mind.
    If you can make your mind fearless, then you can no longer be controlled, but it's a catch 22 for the Christian religions, because if you read outside "you will burn in hell forever in fire and brimstone." That's tough stuff for people to clear out, and rationalize as bullshit.

    But if you don't free your mind, you can never attain your masters degree in "space lizardry" or "out there" for example. MANY won't.

    ~p

    ReplyDelete
  14. Almost nobody will, Christian or not-Christian, and their determined ignore-ance, while being wholly their own right, does not bode well for ANY of us. THIS would be why the evil fucks don't care how many of us are turned into fertilizer. They are CONVINCED they're doing it for good reasons... and MAYBE THEY ARE! In any case, they are not worthy of making these decisions... never have been and never will be. People fail to see how valuing REAL things makes for elevated civilization, civilization where there actually might be a real need to sacrifice lives and the ones making those decisions would be worthy and respected enough for the job. It's IMPOSSIBLE in what we have all been forced to call "the real world". It MAY be that pre-diluvian civilization was okay in this department. It would seem so because most of the North American indians really had highly advanced social structures, mostly intimately in accord with the environment. It actually makes more sense that they would be remnants of high civilization, because, contrary to what wasichu thought of them, they were FAR more civilized than Europeans.

    ReplyDelete
  15. I've been ego / boisterous
    It's still important not to get brainwashed any direction.
    ~p

    ReplyDelete
  16. Precisely! Vitally important!

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.