let us break for a moment to contemplate just how out there i really am

[click image]

.

It is conceivable I'm not even from here.

.

In celebration, I turn to concentrate on torsion physics and fascism, and resolve to continue seeking out bits to hear or hear again that perform the function of sharpening my understanding of what is going on, why, for instance, we could possibly find someone of Steven Chu's stature saying what he has said on TV, to the whole world, despite the oceans of evidence putting the lie to it. That's just one instance of the counterintuitive phenomena this stuff helps contextualize, and I submit you have been trained to find it out there precisely so you cannot ever possibly play with a full deck.

.

Next I'm trying an Ickequake... which may or may not end up being the wrong kind of out there, but I won't know until I try.

If I summon the courage to look at the news again tonight, I will surely update you somewhere here, but, above all, one must not let that stuff close in on one's inner cosmos. It's gotta stay clear and wide open. This involves a special sort of attention, one that can almost be called an entertainment, but is deadly serious stuff in the true mind, the one mind. So continually goofing off and calling it necessary to maintain sanity, or mind expansion, or sane, isn't funny... or fun... or you wouldn't be so fucking sensitive about it. No. The engagement, the absorption, must be childlike, not childish. You can definitely tell which track you're on by checking-in with that distinction. It's just the kind of attention that is childlike, not the one attending, don't forget. You aren't soaking it all up like a sponge because you don't know any better. You are soaking it all up like a sponge because you are strong enough to absorb things and take only the nutrients and eliminate the toxins and chaff.

Do you remember your strength? Step back. Take a look.

.

Okay, I can tell already the one bit you do NOT want to miss is THIS ONE....

.

The rest of it is proving nearly unendurable for me, but I'm hangin' in to hear Judy Wood, somewhere near the end. Susan Lindauer is talking right now, and somehow I have a hard time listening to her stuff.... I don't know exactly the source of my disinclination to listen to her, but it has been present every single time I've heard her on any subject. The poor thing has been through hell, and so the stridency of righteous indignation seems to have permanently entered into her tone and demeanor. Yuck. She blessedly ends somewhere in the middle of the tenth video here.

Judy Wood starts at minute 8 on video 10. Some people might have trouble listening to her—she's not exactly a showbiz type, to say the least—but I admire her intense determination to stick to the facts, to the observables and dedication to keep plugging away at what citizens used to consider effective action. She is WORTH your time... a good listen in conjunction with Farrell on The Irish Side of the Moon... extremely....

I don't blame you at all if you don't want to endure this playlist, but don't miss the Icke segment, and try to find the courage to listen to Judy Wood. The rest of it is entirely missable... entirely.

.

Sometimes I look and cannot, cannot find, but others:

So do we counsel fatalism, a dark, defeated surrender, a retreat into bitter, curdled quietude? Not a whit. We advocate action, positive action, unstinting action, doing the only thing that human beings can do, ever: Try this, try that, try something else again; discard those approaches that don't work, that wreak havoc, that breed death and cruelty; fight against everything that would draw us down again into our own mud; expect no quarter, no lasting comfort, no true security; offer no last word, no eternal truth, but just keep stumbling, falling, careening, backsliding, crawling toward the broken light.

Chris Floyd has his moments.

.
love, 99
.

hot off the pixels

[click image, via Phil]

.

NYPD footage of 9/11 attack, just out on Cryptome. I don't see anything but the worrisome color of the pyroclastic clouds just now, but I'm damn tired.

.
love, 99
.

the einsteins at PNAC are at it again

[click image]

.

This has heavily to do with why I'm trying mightily not to obsess on the pushbutton revolutions in full swing right now.

In a distinct echo of the tactics they pursued to encourage US intervention in the Balkans and Iraq, a familiar clutch of neo-conservatives appealed Friday for the United States and NATO to "immediately" prepare military action to help bring down the regime of Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi and end the violence that is believed to have killed well over a thousand people in the past week.

The appeal, which came in the form of a letter signed by 40 policy analysts, including more than a dozen former senior officials who served under President George W. Bush, was organised and released by the Foreign Policy Initiative (FPI), a two-year-old neo-conservative group that is widely seen as the successor to the more-famous – or infamous – Project for the New American Century (PNAC).

Warning that Libya stood "on the threshold of a moral and humanitarian catastrophe", the letter, which was addressed to President Barack Obama, called for specific immediate steps involving military action, in addition to the imposition of a number of diplomatic and economic sanctions to bring "an end to the murderous Libyan regime".

In particular, it called for Washington to press NATO to "develop operational plans to urgently deploy warplanes to prevent the regime from using fighter jets and helicopter gunships against civilians and carry out other missions as required; (and) move naval assets into Libyan waters" to "aid evacuation efforts and prepare for possible contingencies;" as well as "(e)stablish the capability to disable Libyan naval vessels used to attack civilians."

I know the place of their birth and it ain't in the GORGEOUS courage and transcendent love of the people rising and being slaughtered for it. No, no, no it ain't. I'm trying not to talk about it too much because I think I might go postal from more people reporting as though this were a sporting event and more citizens waxing so smugly confused about it all.

.
love, 99
.

you can blow with this or you can blow with that

[click image]

.

I can blow with both, but you can choose between some engaging hours with old Tsarion interviews and gaping at some really lame WikiLeaks response proposal... that... er... isn't working out very well at all. Up to you.

.

Extra Credit....

.

Ultra Extra Credit....

.
love, 99
.

i told you so

[click image]

.

Now Wikileaks has provided the proof. You might want to contemplate the implications of this for a few moments. Among other things, it makes Judy Wood and Joseph Farrell seem a lot less out there on the matter of 9/11.

.
love, 99
.

9/11 cables finally being published

[click image]

.

I can't get into it until I get some urgent chores behind me, but I figgered you'd want the hedzup....

.

One other point: the fact that the government was asking newspapers precisely which cables they’d publish makes me wonder whether they didn’t have — and may still not have, though given the numbers of copies floating around I suspect they now know — a clear idea of which cables were included in the document dump. Geoff Morrell’s press conference last week made it clear that they still only consider Bradley Manning a person of interest in the leak of the larger dump, meaning that if he leaked them, they haven’t identified how he did so. But is it possible that — at least in November — they didn’t even know what cables were included in the dump?

Let that sink in.

.
love, 99
.

i wish i could hear the second hour

[click image, audio, one hour]

.

I really hate to complicate your life like this, and I know Judy Wood is harder to follow than Richard Gage, remaining cryptic about too much, choosing her words carefully, but... she does a better job explaining what was observable on 9/11 than the CD guys. No. Really. After the countless hours we've spent on this, it's hard to give up and switch to something even less likely to get public support, but... truth is a cruel mistress.

[There are a lot of helpful links and videos at the Red Ice link, beside the audio.]

.
love, 99
.

bless jesse

[click image]

.

This is a must see — should be mandatory viewing! —Agent BB2

I wish to hell this didn't have to be discussed in such a circus-like format, but I'm ALWAYS wishing for that sort of thing and NEVER get it.

.
love, 99
.

max talking with bonnie

[click image, mp3, one hour]

.

A really good Guns and Butter....

.
love, 99
.

little boy calls little boys little boys and the rest of us idiots

[click image]

.

To my shock, I have found that the Pentagon Missile thing is still in dispute. Jesus. And this obviously intelligent hypnosis victim here can't tell his physics from his bellybutton. Crikey.

Ry, you little shit, I was watching when the first images were coming out of DC. The bottom floor was NOT knocked out. There was a hole that looked to be about twenty feet in diameter and there was NO damage to the lawn.

THERE ALSO WAS NO PLANE.

Obviously, you've been so busy stewing about the Israeli involvement that you haven't LOOKED at any of it well enough. It has long been established that the plane heading for the Pentagon was a fighter plane that shot the missile into it and overflew the building. If you think for a minute you might agree they wouldn't risk either not doing enough damage or too much, at the Pentagon. So even if the physics worked for it to have been a 757, it wouldn't have been one. Don't be a jackass. Don't be a laws of physics denier. And quit being such a fatuous little boy panting over a fucker making a fat living off Palestine's agony and our impotent loathing for Israel's perfidies.

.

Unless, of course, it was a directed energy beam....

.
love, 99
.

scott horton talking to coleen rowley

[click image]

.

WikiLeaks could have prevented 9/11....

.
love, 99
.

reminder

[click image]

.

I love Coleen Rowley.

I linked this at the time, but it bears repeating, and bless Max for reminding me to remind you.

WikiLeaks and 9/11: What if?
Frustrated investigators might have chosen to leak information that their superiors bottled up, perhaps averting the terrorism attacks.
By Coleen Rowley and Bogdan Dzakovic
October 15, 2010

If WikiLeaks had been around in 2001, could the events of 9/11 have been prevented? The idea is worth considering.

The organization has drawn both high praise and searing criticism for its mission of publishing leaked documents without revealing their source, but we suspect the world hasn't yet fully seen its potential. Let us explain.

There were a lot of us in the run-up to Sept. 11 who had seen warning signs that something devastating might be in the planning stages. But we worked for ossified bureaucracies incapable of acting quickly and decisively. Lately, the two of us have been wondering how things might have been different if there had been a quick, confidential way to get information out.

One of us, Coleen Rowley, was a special agent/legal counsel at the FBI's Minneapolis division and worked closely with those who arrested would-be terrorist Zacarias Moussaoui on an immigration violation less than a month before the World Trade Center was destroyed.

Following up on a tip from flight school instructors who had become suspicious of the French Moroccan who claimed to want to fly a jet as an "ego boost," Special Agent Harry Samit and an INS colleague had detained Moussaoui. A foreign intelligence service promptly reported that he had connections with a foreign terrorist group, but FBI officials in Washington inexplicably turned down Samit's request for authority to search Moussaoui's laptop computer and personal effects.

Those same officials stonewalled Samit's supervisor, who pleaded with them in late August 2001 that he was "trying to keep someone from taking a plane and crashing into the World Trade Center." (Yes, he was that explicit.) Later, testifying at Moussaoui's trial, Samit testified that he believed the behavior of his FBI superiors in Washington constituted "criminal negligence."

The 9/11 Commission ultimately concluded that Moussaoui was most likely being primed as a Sept. 11 replacement pilot and that the hijackers probably would have postponed their strike if information about his arrest had been announced.

WikiLeaks might have provided a pressure valve for those agents who were terribly worried about what might happen and frustrated by their superiors' seeming indifference. They were indeed stuck in a perplexing, no-win ethical dilemma as time ticked away. Their bosses issued continual warnings against "talking to the media" and frowned on whistle-blowing, yet the agents felt a strong need to protect the public.

The other one of us writing this piece, Federal Air Marshal Bogdan Dzakovic, once co-led the Federal Aviation Administration's Red Team to probe for vulnerabilities in airport security. He also has a story of how warnings were ignored in the run-up to Sept. 11. In repeated tests of security, his team found weaknesses nine out of 10 times that would make it possible for hijackers to smuggle weapons aboard and seize control of airplanes. But the team's reports were ignored and suppressed, and the team was shut down entirely after 9/11.

In testimony to the 9/11 Commission, Dzakovic summed up his experience this way: "The Red Team was extraordinarily successful in killing large numbers of innocent people in the simulated attacks …[and yet] we were ordered not to write up our reports and not to retest airports where we found particularly egregious vulnerabilities.... Finally, the FAA started providing advance notification of when we would be conducting our 'undercover' tests and what we would be checking."

The commission included none of Dzakovic's testimony in its report.

Looking back, Dzakovic believes that if WikiLeaks had existed at the time, he would have gone to it as a last resort to highlight what he knew were serious vulnerabilities that were being ignored.

The 9/11 Commission concluded, correctly in our opinion, that the failure to share information within and between government agencies — and with the media and the public — led to an overall failure to "connect the dots."

Many government careerists are risk-averse. They avoid making waves and, when calamity strikes, are more concerned with protecting themselves than with figuring out what went wrong and correcting it.

Decisions to speak out inside or outside one's chain of command — let alone to be seen as a whistle-blower or leaker of information — is fraught with ethical and legal questions and can never be undertaken lightly. But there are times when it must be considered. Official channels for whistle-blower protections have long proved illusory. In the past, some government employees have gone to the media, but that can't be done fully anonymously, and it also puts reporters at risk of being sent to jail for refusing to reveal their sources. For all of these reasons, WikiLeaks provides a crucial safety valve.

Coleen Rowley, a FBI special agent for more than 20 years, was legal counsel to the FBI field office in Minneapolis from 1990 to 2003. Bogdan Dzakovic was a special agent for the FAA's security division. He filed a formal whistle-blower disclosure against the FAA for ignoring the vulnerabilities documented by the Red Team. For the past nine years he has been relegated to entry-level staff work for the Transportation Security Administration.

Coleen Rowley is my kind of countryman.

.
love, 99
.

reminder of the depths of perfidy, sinking to which is second nature

[click image]

.

I have heard alternative researchers bitching about how these shows always manage to muddy up their work, even while purporting to uphold it. In fact, I am beginning to notice these productions following so closely on the heels of each new bit put out by these researchers there can't be much doubt that it's the old offers-of-mainstreamizing-the-rebels-to-neutralize-them thing at work. It's sickening how well it works.

I have linked here another exploration of Tesla's stuff that I feel is more edifying than confusing because we find ourselves in the middle of yet another spectacular display of how perfidious billionaires mindfuck the public out of getting the clue, out of advancing into the clean air of actuality. I'm pretty sure this is a completely useless workout of my mangled finger to point, but, hell, maybe something herein or herewith can spark an ah-ha in someone somewhere on Planet Earth.

You never can tell.

.

HUNNERTS OF WIKILEAKS MIRRORS....

.
love, 99
.

sam wanted to know what i think of this

[click image]

.

I am unspeakably sorry to have to tell you that I think all the pressure from Truthers is about to unfold a limited hangout. The difference between going for the popularity and going for the evidence and taking legal action is that the popularity can drown out the whole truth. Plus, here will be a SPECTACULAR hedge against the mounting rage of the population. It will mollify the kids, and it will distract the entire nation... and we still won't get the truth... and we will be even further enslaved.

Sorry.

I so don't want to be a wet rag. I was falling for it for a long time, but there kept being questions, pretty consequential ones, and all kinds of investigating and researching kept interrupting my contemplation of them, but taking out the hours necessary to give Judy Wood a full hearing, combined with my having learned about the technologies possible through the engineerable torsion physics, well, my questions were answered. The only thing that bugs me now is why all the bombs and nanothermite except if they didn't know their new weapon would work?

I loved how McIlvaine kept Rivera off his bullshit sensationalism though. I'd die for Bob McIlvaine.

.
love, 99
.

i think coleen rowley pretty seriously ROCKS

[click image]

.

How many people think of the carnage Wikileaks can PREVENT? We're all busy sniping in our confusion and paranoia, forgetting COMPLETELY that transparency is vital to more than just our ability to stay informed. OUR LIVES DEPEND ON IT!

.
love, 99
.

thank heavens

[right click image, mp3, one hour and HERE for Part 2, also one hour]

.

My favorite space lizard expert has been missing in action too long and I just found, against numerous intimations of impending doom, that he's still happening.

.

After listening to this, I suppose now is an okay time to tell you that, after a great deal of thought, and a rather rude smack in the teeth by Richard Gage [HERE at 1:45] via one of his increasingly urgent newsletters and action appeals, something I have been trying to convince myself was just a sloppy mistake under pressure of a live interview, I have gone from merely willing to assume the agnostic stance to hear people with diverging views to my view now diverging.

Dr. Jones has the dubious record of having come out with a devastating limited hangout on the matter of cold fusion, and for all the noise and activism and ardent appeals from the prime movers in the Truth Movement, none of them has made a move to assert this stuff through legal channels, done anything more than appeal to the public. This "error" by Richard Gage is just not palatable to me, try as I might to give him the benefit of the doubt. That was a question to which there is a pat, an airtight pat, answer and I think he has even used it in the past; to wit: office fires do not collapse OR powderize OR topple steel buildings. Gage has stood in front of the world showing slide after slide of office fire damage to still utterly upright, if gutted, towering steel infernos. WHY did he say that?

Having spent many, many, many hours listening with minute attention to anything I can find on the matter of torsion physics and having had some extremely vexing questions answered by Judy Wood's mountains of collected evidence, I don't think I can even go back to the standard Truther's position on the matter. I might not even be able to inch back to plain agnosticism anymore... too much of Einstein's music and too loud to ignore for the sake of consensus. Reality is not consensual. It simply is.

The one part that seems to try to attach itself to her camp, that I have not heard her assert, is the "no planes" theory, and while I understand people's hesitation about the light material of the planes not being able to make plane-shaped holes in the towers, I don't think that applies at the speeds we're talking about. So I think the planes DID hit the buildings, even though, yes, all the people who say they saw them could just have thought they saw them, with the idea already firmly implanted in everyone's heads, and the videos could have been doctored... yadda, yadda, yadda. That still seems utterly too fantastic and utterly unnecessary. They may or may not have been the planes nearly everyone believes they were, but I still think they were planes.

Whatever. The Truther guys have not been acting like citizens bent on truth. They have been acting like citizens bent on publicizing a version of truth. Whereas, Judy Wood has been doggedly compiling outright astonishing amounts of evidence and it's all pointing at weaponized torsion physics. And this fits much better with Tarpley's reporting on the matter as well. AND she has sued NIST for their piece of shit report. She has taken FAR more heat from the powers that be than any of the prime movers in the CD crowd, even though she is far less popular than they are... whatever could that mean?

So. I have been struggling with how to put this for five days, and might have gone on struggling for X more days had it not been for this interview landing in my lap tonight. I don't know how many of you have the time to put into it, and a bunch of the materials I have linked over the months to help you come up to speed on the torsion physics thing have been ripped down from YouTube. I have done my best to replace them, but I don't even know if the replacements are still standing. I can only say that I have been riveted to stuff and invested many, many, many hours on it, and based on these things, I can't but say I think the "disinfo agents" everyone is so paranoid about are the ones who made everyone paranoid about "disinfo agents" to begin with.

We seem to have proven nanothermite exists in large quantities in the dust. That does not mean that the nanothermite caused the damage we saw. It may have helped cause it. There may have been a large amount of it stored in one of the buildings. Or it may not have been there at all... only in the samples given to certain scientists. It makes no difference.

That may have been a feature of the great thought experiment of just hearing people without prejudice I forgot to mention. If you listen to them in good faith, there is a possibility they will change your mind.

.

And, yeah, this Tsarion character is much better when he's not ranting. How odd that I started out hearing him in a bunch of interviews where he was so angry and going so fast and showing how little he gets to speak with people conversant in his subjects... at least five interviews, probably more, before I got to hear him when he's more relaxed, not ranting, not so pissed off you almost can't hear him at all. Of course, when you realize some of the things he's realized, very much tends to piss you off.

HINT:

This seriously applies to the present discussion....

.

It took some digging, but THIS should go a long way toward explaining that otherwise unfathomable commercial at the end of the Tsarion playlist.... This has been bugging me for the better part of a day now, and I found the thing that lets the guy in the main body of the interview be the same one who then comes on and appears to be selling balderdash to the credulous. Since he has seen correctly into so much, it doesn't follow that such a one would be selling this stuff, but for all any of us truly knows, he may have seen also correctly into the age old problem with "divination". I don't know if I will pursue it to find out, or just leave it at this, but it is at least a comfort to me that, right or wrong, he is in this stuff in good faith.

.
love, 99
.

max making up to us for a rather blaring error in today's keiser report

[click image]

.

A decent compromise, all told, everything considered....

I am practicing no-handed smoking. This is the harder because I've switched to longer cigarettes. I can get them from the rez much more cheaply than the old Camel straights and they don't have the toxins added to them. But if my wimpy lips don't tune up, here, pretty soon, I may have to resort to cutting these puppies in half. I can't get used to it. Plus, it'll save even more $$$ if I smoke half a cigarette at a time. On top of this, I have ceased smoking on my front porch only because I can get more than enough air flow in here to carry the smoke out immediately... things don't get stanky and yeller when the smoke wafts right out, but when it gets too cold to do this and I have to go back out on my porch, I'm going to be feeling really sorry for myself.

In fact, I am considering trying to make it through the winter without turning on the heat at all, just wearing all kinds of clothes and toughing it out. If I do that, I might just leave all the windows and doors open on the lee side of the storms and smoke and shiver my way through adversity. OR go to El Cajon for a couple months, take up my second cousin on her invitation for me to spend the time down there with her. Southern California gives me nightmares. I might not be able to stand it. We'll have to see how things shake out.

I'm not in a very good mood. I'm bummed about my friends. They're watching tv. They're talking about how maybe it's time for bugs to inherit the earth. Pissing and moaning about the climate nazis blowing up school children in their propaganda. Deciding they like the way Andrew Bacevich thinks. Busying themselves in the garden or with their sundry family hassles and commitments. Reminding me that recessions and depressions ALWAYS spring back. Letting all the flagrant indicators of open fascism roll off as though they were invisible molecules of toxins or water rolling off a duck. The ones who recognize we have a fight in front of us won't fight. The others just flat out won't recognize it.

They're fussing over Prop 25 gonna wipe out Prop 13 and no amount of reminding them that it expressly states it won't, and how anyone who tried to wipe it out would be lynched, seems to settle their hash. I think Prop 25 is a TINY move in the direction of more power to the people but nobody seems to even think about that anymore, just squabble like maniacs over who and what will get their vote, even as their positions on the issues scream that they already know their votes don't make fuck-all in the way of a difference.

I just got a flier from some broad making an oath to yank teachers' medical benefits to save the County $9,600 should she be elected to the school board... spend that money on the KIDS. That's about a buck and a half per kid. Oh, right. I'm so gonna vote for this bitch... the only one of the bunch who could afford fliers. If I were famous, I'd start a drive for everyone to vote for Martin Luther King for all offices until the revolution has yanked everyone from them and we start again.

But, no, nothing will be done, and so long to the unlucky....

.
love, 99
.

the eternal, the incomparable, the beautiful farrakhan

[click image]

.

My hands are stinging from slapping my desk. I think my contacts may have floated away. I love this guy to itty bitty bits. He's a thousand times more man than our president could hope to become if he lived for a thousand years.

[He was singing it fifteen years ago, this that so many of us are screaming at the tops of our lungs now... before that. You wonder why they are so careful to smear men like this every time they open their mouths? BECAUSE THEY ARE TELLING THE TRUTH.]

.
love, 99
.

9/11 and the nazi bell

[click image, video, hour and a half]

.

If you never listened to this interview, I think maybe it would be helpful to listen to it before you watch the 9/11 Truth video at the image link.

.
love, 99
.

for your information

[click image]

.

The guy is very famous and documented to the hilt.

.
love, 99
.