Showing posts with label physics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label physics. Show all posts

02 April 2011

farrell on the edge

[click image]

.

All Nazis, all the time....

You can go HERE if you want it with the visuals, more Nazi-mania, and HERE for the mp3 of an earlier interview about Giza... assuming you can bear the clowning of this bubba....

.
love, 99
.

22 March 2011

tonight in out there

[click image]

.

Earlier, I put it to you to consult the leading lights of out there to get a more rounded idea of what might be going on behind some or all—and maybe even this latest—of the catastrophes and anomalies plaguing us over the past decade. I chose to link you to the Hoagland interview because he was speaking in more plainly comprehensible terms to the average ear, with a marked dearth of hyperbole—for him—and it applied more closely to the topic. But this interview, mostly on the same subject, with Richard Dolan is worth the listen as well. He provides some valuable insights into some other matters vexing us for a long time, as well.

.
love, 99
.

07 March 2011

social alchemy

[click image, mp3, hour and a half]

.

GeorgeAnn Hughes and Joseph Farrell keep talking....

.
love, 99
.

05 March 2011

HEY

[click image]

.

Snap out of it!

More detail....

Even more detail....

A blogtalkradio interview that starts out badly but gets very interesting....

Playlist of Randy telling about his background....

.
love, 99
.

19 February 2011

uh-oh

[click image]

.

The Zionists are at it again.
But for another thing — notice that date: 11,000 years old. If this is correct, we’re looking at something old enough that, as the article linked points out, was built at the time humanity was supposedly just transitioning from being hunter-gatherers to agricultural. Such a tower near the ancient ruins of Jericho, however, is another little monkey wrench thrown into the works of that academic model. This date would place it around 9,000 BC, that is to say, roughly during the same time period as the date proposed by Dr. Robert Schoch and John Anthony West for the re-dating of the Sphinx.
Either looking for the proof of their chosentude or to hide the evidence that it was another population altogether, I suppose.... :-P

.

Oh, and, uh, why am I not surprised?

.
love, 99
.

12 February 2011

wow

[click image]

.

I just went to see if maybe there was a new interview to hear, and there are FOUR new ones that must have just shown up. I thought for a moment to pick one of these mp3s to link, but decided it's better you pick for yourself. I've heard them all, some twice, except these four latest ones. I have to say, I am very grateful for GeorgeAnn Hughes. She has literally afforded me many hours of good listening, and I'd send her some of my no money if I could. If you have any, I hope you will send her some for me. No kidding. I can tell she's a great lady and I've listened to her come up with some amazingly cool things to say and ask about. She and her guests are usually well worth your earprints.

.

Okay, if you are persisting in being a judgmental twat, THIS ONE is about the JFK assassination. So if yer too lazy or too busy or too hypnotized to listen to the stuff about physics and tighter explanations for historical and current events, I know most of you will make time for JFK... because, if you wouldn't, neither would you ever read this blog....

.

And... in the last fifteen minutes or so they discuss the Egypt stuff: the elevation of Zahi Hawass to cabinet level; agents provocateurs; looters; hidden hands.... We're talking about someone HIGHLY intelligent and WELL educated—a doctorate from Oxford—talking about things with which he is NOT merely casually acquainted.

.
love, 99
.

11 February 2011

more on the antiquities looting and hidden hands

[click image]

.

This will only be interesting to people working on the torsion physics angle of our struggle to emerge from the burden of being purposely deluded our whole lives.

.
love, 99
.

24 January 2011

i wish i could hear the second hour

[click image, audio, one hour]

.

I really hate to complicate your life like this, and I know Judy Wood is harder to follow than Richard Gage, remaining cryptic about too much, choosing her words carefully, but... she does a better job explaining what was observable on 9/11 than the CD guys. No. Really. After the countless hours we've spent on this, it's hard to give up and switch to something even less likely to get public support, but... truth is a cruel mistress.

[There are a lot of helpful links and videos at the Red Ice link, beside the audio.]

.
love, 99
.

14 January 2011

i think farrell and sarfatti should speak

[click image]

.

Sarfatti, as you will have seen the other night, seems to think classical physics can get there, but he's a hippie, so... I think he should get together with Farrell and hash it out.

You realize, of course, that if what Farrell is telling us is even partly true, and there are many reasons to think so—very many—all this horrific damage they are doing to us with oil drilling and blowing shit up to extract coal has been about killing off most of the population, letting earth take a few million years to recover herself, and basking on some other paradise in the interim....

.
love, 99
.

12 January 2011

just how nigh is the end, anyway?

[click image]

.

I've been listening to Jack Sarfatti going on about matters physics and et cetera for a couple hours, and being delighted by his giddiness over a published theory. I've only been listening with half an ear, but his delight alone is worth the time. I will definitely get back to it, but now am switching over to listen to him hold forth with Dan Smith about The End and et cetera... at length. For all of us Physics of Out There fans, we have hit the jackpot here.

.
love, 99
.

05 January 2011

tonight in out there we have the case for antigravity

[click image, video, two hours]

.

I could use some. Not in an escapist way. In a lightness way.

.
love, 99
.

27 December 2010

little boy calls little boys little boys and the rest of us idiots

[click image]

.

To my shock, I have found that the Pentagon Missile thing is still in dispute. Jesus. And this obviously intelligent hypnosis victim here can't tell his physics from his bellybutton. Crikey.

Ry, you little shit, I was watching when the first images were coming out of DC. The bottom floor was NOT knocked out. There was a hole that looked to be about twenty feet in diameter and there was NO damage to the lawn.

THERE ALSO WAS NO PLANE.

Obviously, you've been so busy stewing about the Israeli involvement that you haven't LOOKED at any of it well enough. It has long been established that the plane heading for the Pentagon was a fighter plane that shot the missile into it and overflew the building. If you think for a minute you might agree they wouldn't risk either not doing enough damage or too much, at the Pentagon. So even if the physics worked for it to have been a 757, it wouldn't have been one. Don't be a jackass. Don't be a laws of physics denier. And quit being such a fatuous little boy panting over a fucker making a fat living off Palestine's agony and our impotent loathing for Israel's perfidies.

.

Unless, of course, it was a directed energy beam....

.
love, 99
.

02 December 2010

plasma physics

[click image]

.

My brain needs taking out like an old rug for a beating. I can't make you slow for it, but I think it's a good idea while everyone is in a race to vindicate what they already think and the crowds are roaring, bugles blaring, wheels screeching. The announcer is so loud on the PA that it's drowning out everything. Ripping your mind away from it is the best way to weaken it just now.

.
love, 99
.

26 November 2010

great listening

[click image, mp3, hour and a half]

.

Truly great listening. If you want quite a few hours of it, go HERE, and if you have the dough, try to throw some their way for me please.

.

Or, scare the crap outta yerseff HERE....

.
love, 99
.

19 November 2010

maybe i'm being too cryptic

[click image]

.

I am up past my eyeballs with 'the world' and I try to go off and pay attention to my doctoral degree in Out There, my bodhisattva gig where I find out what people think and how they think and get enough understanding to be able to speak their lingo, and suddenly all that's coming up in my little universe of Out There specialists is THE most unbelievable crap. Some exploitative old witch in Missouri and some UTTER charlatan whose name is known in bliss ninny circles and I'm ready to start batting buildings into the sky in the best tradition of Popeye AFTER his spinach. We are doomed if these people are the ones we must rely on. The ninny exploiters AND the humanity exploiters.
Nato reaches missile shield deal
Alliance agrees to expand Europe-based defence system, but bows to Turkish concerns over naming Iran as a threat.
Last Modified: 20 Nov 2010 | 04:11 GMT

Nato leaders have approved plans to expand a European missile defence system that would protect all of the military alliance's member nations including the US.

Barack Obama, the US president, announced the agreement on Friday at the end of the first day of a summit of leaders from the 28-member grouping in Lisbon, the Portuguese capital.

The system would add security to the US's own system based in North America.

"For the first time, we've agreed to develop a missile defence capability that is strong enough to cover all Nato European territory and populations as well as the United States," Obama said.

He said that the shield "offers a role for all of our allies, it responds to the threats of our times. It shows our determination to protect our citizens from the threat of ballistic missiles".

"An attack on one Nato member is an attack on all,'' he said.

However, officials were careful not to suggest where the ballistic missile threat could come from after Nato-member Turkey raised objections to a system specifically designed to stop attacks from Iran.

Turkey's concerns

"We are categorically opposed to have a country named [as a threat] and our request appears to have been accepted," Abdullah Gul, the Turkish president, told reporters before leaving Ankara, the Turkish capital, to attend the summit.

"Turkey cannot join a project that is aimed at a specific country," he said, stressing that Nato was a defensive alliance aimed at defending its members against any ballistic threat and is not an organisation designed "to intimidate and threaten".

"The project must cover all [Nato] members without exception ... It will not be aimed at Iran, we said it," he said.

Diplomats at the summit said there had been intense debate in the run-up to the summit about whether Iran should be targeted as a specific threat in the public document they adopt.

The US had asked Turkey, a Nato-member, to host some of the radar defences and to approve the proposal.

Turkey is mindful of its delicate position with neighbouring Iran and said it would refuse to sign a Nato document that names Iran as the threat in the final declaration.

"Turkey does not want to be the military front for Nato, it wants to be the diplomatic face of Nato in the Arab and Muslim world," Marwan Bishara, Al Jazeera's senior political analyst, said.

"But any state that would dare launch a missile against Europe would be obliterated the day after - so who would be so suicidal as to launch a missile against Europe?"

Nato compromise

Anita McNaught, Al Jazeera's correspondent in Istanbul, said: "The compromise that Nato seems to have arrived at, even ahead of this meeting, is that no countries will be cited and the stress will be on this being a defensive system and not an offensive one.

"[Turkey has] worked extremely hard in this region to deal with the perception of threat among its neighbours, to de-escalate the sense of jeopardy and danger and defensiveness and offensiveness ... that has caused so many problems."

McNaught said that Turkey also wanted to make sure that the system would in no way be used to protect Israel from attack.

"It [Turkey] wants to be clear that this system is for the defence of territories from Turkey's eastern border, westward. It wants to be sure this is not a 'proxy' defence system for Israel." she said.

"It does not want any of the intelligence gathered through this system to be shared with Israel."

'Urgent need'

Anders Fogh Rasmussen, Nato's secretary general, said that there was an urgent need for the new missile defence system.

"The fact is that more than 30 countries in the world have or are acquiring missile technologies, some of them can even hit targets in the Euro-Atlantic area. And we intend to build a missile defence system to defend against any of these threats."

The expanded system is expected to cost $273 million over the next 10 years, Rasmussen said.

Dmitry Medvedev, the Russian president, who will attend the summit on Saturday has previously fought against the missile shield, saying it was a threat to his country's own nuclear deterrence.

But Nato on Friday decided to invite Russia to join the defence shield, extending its protection across Russian territory.
I'd started out the day just about ready to record a rant, a dharma rant and upload it somewhere I could link you to, just so you could hear the intensity of this, but, no, I gotta save that for when I'm perfectly equanimous or it's worse than not going to help.

So I'm spitting music at you assholes instead.

THESE ASSHOLES ARE NOT FIT TO LEAD. STOP THEM.

.

OR here's five hours of space lizard guys talking about NASA, the moon, mars, space aliens if you feel like having yourself a nice long pickle in the brine this weekend.

.

OR be a little more modest and only blow two and a half hours on Hoagland's Johnson-killed-Kennedy gig... via the torsion field physics gonna bounce us off the surface of the planet... and he gets to it eventually. He's such a braggart, name-dropper confabulator that I have gotten to know exactly what I can skip, move the bar on the video player exactly as far as it takes till he's saying something again, but maybe people need all that blather to hear what he trots out for us.

.
love, 99
.

18 November 2010

kidz in candy stores?

[click image]

.

Bullz in china shops...?

I don't know if this stuff is progress anymore. Between my increasing unease with the state of evolutionary biology... or at least of the biologists... and my aggravation behind finding out how much shit they've been pumping us full of as regards physics, I find I am not welcoming of these "successes" anymore. Bad enough I have had to watch people who should be heroes purposely refusing to reach the obvious conclusions relative to FAMOUS physics conundrums... because it's too wuwu... too not of the realm of the generally accepted already... which, fuck you, is the POINT... but catching them having misled generations of kidz at university and the whole of humanity so egregiously for so long, well, call me grouchy, okay?

.
love, 99
.

29 September 2010

9/11 and the nazi bell

[click image, video, hour and a half]

.

If you never listened to this interview, I think maybe it would be helpful to listen to it before you watch the 9/11 Truth video at the image link.

.
love, 99
.

30 July 2010

put yer oar in the water

[click image, long video playlist about free energy]

.

Would one of you handy type fellas just sit down and make me one of these gadgets?

.

If those guys were too dry for you, maybe you want to try try this Peter Levenda interview instead. It is said herein that America may be rejected by the spirit of man as an unviable entity. Far as I can tell, that has come to pass. Few are consciously aware of it right now, but they'll get to it.

.

26 July 2010

the long-awaited interview about the nazi bell

[click image, via Mister North]

.

This advanced degree in space lizardry is slow going.

If this doesn't do it for you, perhaps you will be more engaged by listening to the interview with Joseph Farrell instead... or before this one... or... not.

.

As you will have noticed if you bothered with this interview, the woman who used to be partners in space lizardry with Bill Ryan, Kerry Cassidy, could maybe win an award for being one of THE most annoying women of all time. I was grateful to find they'd split their operation so I could ignore her crap and pay attention to his. He's quite far enough out, and a MUCH better interviewer, and he isn't incessantly yammering at his victims to "disclose" fantastical things to the viewing public. Sheesh.

07 July 2010

oooh yooou dooon't say...

[click image]

.

Excuuuuuse me, all my bragging this evening... punchy... but, heh, even before I learned about this scalar/torsion physics stuff, I had some monster objections to what the particle physicists were trying to put out there, those quantum mechanics who go wild when I call them that. They, of course, and maybe even should, take umbrage when someone who hasn't a clue what she's talking about pokes holes in their elaborate, abstruse, so-lofty-as-to-be-intergalactic-sounding theories. I've found myself having to side with Einstein in these matters and it pisses them off. They try to dismiss it as me just having a crush on Einstein. Since most of how I know they're off it is contained in that no-language zone and so I must say I do NOT sound like I know what's involved. I refuse to do the jargon... not the least because the jargon is only about making stuff that isn't that hard seem insurmountably imposing. I am no physicist, but I can figure out when they're full of shit pretty darn quickly. They get steamed about it. How dare I? It's swiftly apparent that I really do make myself clear-enough to them, though. The steam. Then their only advantage is the ability to save face with paternalistically-toned gibberish, sounding to lay persons who may be within earshot as though they MUST be expert. This can leave them seeming as though they may have just won an argument with me when what they're actually doing is akin to picking burst bubblegum bits from their whiskers... and everyone is vexed why I'm the one laughing.

.