Showing posts with label literature. Show all posts
Showing posts with label literature. Show all posts

04 March 2011

i was devastated

[click image]

.

I, of course, don't remember for certain, but I think it was the first time a movie had ever sucked me in that way. Listening to the story being read isn't exactly the same as reading it to yourself or watching the movie, but, even so, the slowly mounting dread coming from nowhere exactly is retained.

.

I would be handing out One Hundred Years of Solitude.
March 5 marks the first annual World Book Night, an insanely bold initiative whereby a million books will be given away. The people handing them out will be members of the public who have chosen a particular book they love enough to recommend to strangers on the street. The tens of thousands of “givers” include Brian Eno, Tracy Chevalier and Julian Assange, who is giving out All Quiet on the Western Front; the Duchess of Cornwall, meanwhile, recommends One Day by David Nicholls. The launch will take the form of a party for 10,000 revellers tonight in Trafalgar Square. Look out for Graham Norton and Alan Bennett jostling for position on the fourth plinth.
A lovely idea, wot?

.
love, 99
.

21 January 2011

hammett! hammett! hammet!

[click image]

.

I am going to wet my pants:
It's terse. It's polished. There's crime.

It's never been published - until now.

Fifty years after Dashiell Hammett's death, a national mystery magazine is about to publish a long-lost story by the father of the hard-boiled detective novel, and fans are giddy with excitement.

The story, "So I Shot Him," is one of about a dozen of the San Francisco writer's pieces that were never printed anywhere. Word is that, unlike many works authors choose not to publish, this 12-page thriller is high-quality and complete.

Andrew Gulli, managing editor of the Strand Magazine, stumbled across the piece while poking through Hammett's papers at the University of Texas at Austin. He's featuring it in his Feb. 28 issue.

"It was incredible to find this," Gulli said by phone from his office in Birmingham, Mich. "I found 11 to 14 stories not published, and they're all pretty good - but this one just struck me as vintage Hammett. There was just something fantastic about it."
Hammett is my favorite author. Gabriel García Márquez is but a gnat's eyelash under Dashiell Hammett in my estimation, and ordinarily I would grumble that it was never published before because Hammett didn't want it published. He was exacting... just about merciless... about writing... and I'm not sure I trust anyone out there to say it's" high-quality and complete" when Hammett didn't think so, but... well... I think I'm desperate... or something.

.

For instance, I just heard a Berkeley journalism professor speak of "a pivotal turning point"... so you might be able to hang with my trust issues here... and Hammett might well have socked the guy right in the teeth on the spot.

.
love, 99
.

09 January 2011

ah, poets

[click image]

.

Can't hold back, never could....
My Little Lovers

A lacrymal tincture washes
The cabbage-green skies:
Under the drooling tree with tender shoots,
Your raincoats

White with special moons
With round eyes
Knock together your kneecaps
My ugly ones!

We loved one another at that time,
Blue ugly one!
We ate soft boiled eggs
And chickweed!

One evening you consecrated me poet,
Blond ugly one:
Come down here, that I can whip you
On my lap;

I vomited your brilliantine,
Black ugly one;
You would cut off my mandolin
On the edge of my brow

Bah! my dried saliva,
Red-headed ugly one
Still infects the trenches
Of your round breast!

O my little lovers,
How I hate you!
Plaster with painful blisters
Your ugly tits!

Trample on my old pots
Of sentiment;
—Up now! be ballerinas for me
For one moment!…

Your shoulder blades are out of joint,
O my loves!
A star on your limping backs,
Turn with your turns!

And yet it is for these mutton shoulders
That I have made rhymes!
I would like to break your hips
For having loved!

Insipid pile of stars that have failed,
Fill the corners!
—You will collapse in God, saddled
With ignoble cares!

Under special moons
With round eyes,
Knock together your kneecaps,
My ugly ones!

Rimbaud

...feeling remorse, I'd say.

.
love, 99
.

02 January 2011

another fascination, not sick

[click image]

.

I can't get over this guy. On the one hand, he represents everything I do devotedly despise about people, but on the other, he is such a work of deeply humane art, himself, and so much of what emanates from him, that I feel I could forgive him for residing amid the despicable.
By the Lagoon

There is a bridge in Prospect Park that is
now condemned.
But I walk over it anyway
and I go beyond the collapsed fence that
wards you off from its edges
and I peer over the bannister at the
beautiful lagoon below
with its shallow yet mysterious water
which is a world unto itself —

a world of sky and turtles —

for water and sky are one —

and turtles and birds within them.
And I remember a long time ago —
when I first looked down into this
lagoon and saw it leading away
and I was young and ready to follow roads —

as I still do.
But I used to go there and become almost

mad with being lost by the lagoon

mad with the woods —
mad with the day and its gold and my

solitude among it.

Mad with my own young murderable beauty —

like some crazy screaming bird —

yet silent – exultant —

pale and screaming with solitude beside

the water —

the silent song of solitude surrounding me —

with its splashes and flutters of wind

and strange shrieks of birds.

And then through the leaves black boys
on bicycles came crashing —

shrieking with laughter —
and I stood still, frozen with terror —

thinking
“They are going to kill me” —

feeling myself so murderable there among
the woods —
on the black side of the park —
so murderable by teenaged black boys

on bicycles —

how could they resist murdering me —

a boy trying to be a tree among trees —

but a tree who has not stopped being a boy —

a young man in love with himself as he was

at seventeen —

when he first set out on his wanderings.
This was where his wanderings had led him —

to this abandoned place.
I imagined living there by the lagoon —

that I was that boy I once was,
still living there among the trees.
When night fell, though, terror overcame me

and I left the park and went home.
But that boy stayed there among the trees.

I imagined his life —

that I had been alone all these years.
I was a man of twenty-seven who lived in a

strange rooming house with his sister

and drank and went to night clubs.

But I was that boy I once was.

I lived by the lagoon.
I had not spoken in years.

I had drifted away from humanity.
I peered out from among the leaves.
I look out of my eyes.

I am alone.

This all took place long ago —

in the summer of a book I began to write,

but a real summer as well —

the summer I first found that abandoned place.

That was years ago.

The book is written.
The book is long since finished.

The boy lives in the book.
But I think he is still there by the lagoon.
I think I must have thought that I could

be that boy again.

I still do.
If I spent one night by the lagoon

at dawn I would be gone
and that boy would be there, watching
from the leaves.
But in all the years since I first found that
place I have never dared spend one night

there.
I have always been too frightened.


Edgar Oliver
The kind of honesty here is not worn like a designer shirt, something crafted to show off, and so not honest at all, as is the immortal wont of "artists". I don't think the man could be more different from me, and yet I recognize in my cells so much of what he shares. This is true to such a degree that I feel a sort of rejoicing in listening to him speak in his utterly unique mode—something so universally creepy being to me like an heirloom, a little treasure from people who were old when I was a toddler, echoes from the other side of my own galaxy, nestled in a little tresure box on my desk.

.
love, 99
.

31 December 2010

i have this sick fascination with neil gaiman's hair

[click image]

.

There's just never any telling how you will find it. I mean, it's the more fascinating because there seems to be an ongoing half-hearted attempt to keep it in check, which it defies. No telling how many guys have hair this happy because most of them have the sense to keep it very, very short when it is, uhm, so independent. I only ever started paying attention to him because 86 had gone batshit crazy for American Gods and made me read it. I ended up reading it twice because it was the only book not boxed up when I got out of the hospital, did my six-weeks of doing absolutely nothing but a couple gentle walks a day, and landed all in a pile here. It was good enough to read twice, and I don't know if The Graveyard Book was good enough to listen to twice, but it's gotten almost every award they give for books and, hell, it's an engaging long listen.

.
love, 99
.

i can dream

[click images]

.



.




I had gone to a church basement to hear Auster and Arriaga talk. That was odd because to me church basements are where antiwar protests and freedom movements are born, but this time it was to listen to these great authors talk about novels and screenplays and liking directing because you can look at the beautiful women. It's a very, very engaging discussion and I'm having a fine time.

When they are done and the lights come up in the audience, Robin is sitting about two seats from me, and even though he is smiling, I can't tell if he recognizes me. I get him to move to the seat next to me. Now HE seems shy. Yes, yes, he remembers. "You would write and write and write and then face-to-face... fwoosh." He made a hand motion of a young girl disappearing swiftly and smoothly into the pages of time. I said something about how crazy it was to run into him like this, clear out here in the boondocks. He cracked a half smile. He looked genuinely pleased, but also a little distracted with little winces of discomfort so I left him to himself.

Auster and Arriaga were jumping off the stage and talking happily with everyone in their path. We all went out into the parking lot to make for our various cars. I said good-bye to Robin as he hurried to his car. The other two stuck near me, and I got a chance to tell them how I enjoyed their talk so much that now I really had to read their books, telling Auster that a friend had heavily recommended at least half his books to me. He was very pleased about this. I thought this was going to be the end of it, but, no, we were going back in for another.

Inside now there were about ten of us and the church basement was now in Jenner instead of Smith River. [I so love that about dreams. Easiest trip between those two points ever not even conceivable.] Now it wasn't just authors and people coming to listen to a literary discussion. Now it wasn't set up for an audience facing the stage. It was set up like a meeting was to take place and the people doing the staff work keep flipping back and forth between church member volunteers and hotel staff and back. There was a wife there for one or the other of them, and Auster had been showing a great deal of interest in me, but suddenly it was Arriaga who was engaging me in the very friendliest exchanges, and it seemed to be his wife with him, but not taking any of our banter in any way awry... letting us start turning into close friends completely unimpeded by wife energy.

I saw a desk with a mound of cards and papers on it. Right on top was something clearly with my handwriting on it. It had been a card to Bradley Manning wherein I had enclosed some paltry sum toward his defense. I was going to become alarmed, but noticed that there was a note attached to it that they were sorry but they couldn't deliver the donation and had to return it. Things were very busy in preparation for something, and the whole energy stayed a big roiling leaving from the former situation and planning for another one and setting up to do something right now. The energy was seamlessly leaving / staying / returning / conspiring / planning and all of it in an extremely satisfyingly friendly... no... essentially loving atmosphere. Arriaga was saying very wonderful things to me. He made The Connection.

This couldn't have anything to do with my mp3 player continuing to replay until I get up and turn it off, or the fact that my crazy tiredness and need to get back in bed eighty times today was all about me needing to have one of those bouts where I do all my Phase Four and REM for the month at once. My sinuses are taking their turn being the part with the ice picks in them. It moves around my head. It sometimes is my ears, one or the other, and sometimes my EYES, and sometimes my sinuses, with varying participation in the little necklace of lymph nodes at the top of my neck. Anyway, when it is my sinuses all inflamed, I snore so loudly I keep waking myself up... which was what I kept doing every time I tried to succumb to a nap all day. It was just the gods of dreaming finally grabbing me by the throat and slamming me down on my bed that let me get the dreaming in before the snores could prevent it.

So. Now I'm going to pretend I am back at the monastery, getting my coffee and puffing my carcinogens before hitting the Zendo at five. I'm going to—in honor of this pleasant dreaming—pretend that I have finally trained my haywire circadian rhythms to go to sleep at nine and be up by five. The IDEAL schedule for anyone like me.

IS there anyone like that?

.
love, 99
.

17 August 2010

something i read in harper's

[click image, video playlist that may or may not be missing some parts, couldn't find them....]

.

Can't find it on the tubes, and dumbly just ripped out the paragraph so can't even cite the author.
Let's lie and say there are only two kinds of writers I like, the caffeinated and the sleepy. Balzac exemplifies the the caffeinated. He drank coffee to the point of a trembling hand—something like thirty cups a day—and then he'd masturbate to the very edge of orgasm, but not over, and that state—agitated, excited to the point of near madness—was Balzac's sweet spot, in terms of composing. Then there's the sleepy: De Quincy with his opium, Milton waking up his red-slippered daughters to take down verses that had come to him in a dream. We might also think of the method by which Benjamin Franklin purportedly came up with inventions: he'd deprive himself of sleep, then, exhausted, sit in an uncomfortable chair while holding a heavy metal ball in each hand so that when he'd nod off a hand would go limp and its ball fall, making a sound that would wake him from his dreams. That was how he came up with his best ideas for inventions, basically asleep—just not so asleep that he couldn't take down a few notes.
We don't push ourselves, and we don't get outside the box enough to produce our best stuff.

Useless, and venal, pursuits take up all our excuse generation capabilities, being safer and maybe even profitable.

I'm a little worried about being both caffeinated and sleepy, here, but comforted that the same issue informed me that "neon on Jupiter is absorbed into raindrops of helium."

.

05 August 2010

today in black like me

[click image]

.

I was very young when I saw the movie, and felt it was a metaphor for certain parts of our society. I was a little older when I read the book and it made me think of Martin and Malcolm. I didn't know until a few years ago that a black man wrote it. It made me sooooo angry that they had a white man play the part in that masterpiece. I guess there are good arguments for and against, but what I really want to say is I am SO sick of the race thing.

For a long while I just refused to believe racism, to any measurable extent, was still at work in America, because nowhere in my experience could I find it, but friends from other parts of the country insisted I was dreaming, that it was alive and well all over the country, telling me ugly story after ugly story after ugly story to convince me the country was NOT as progressive as Northern California. So I caved, but I may be on the verge of going back to my former position on the matter because I am beginning to think the whole business is a manufactured-by-the-fascist-media bullshit wedge issue, generated on purpose to keep everybody frightened and confused and resentful.

I just DON'T believe it. People don't want to hate each other. People don't want to kill each other. They have to have some sort of environmental conditioning to get them there. We're being played. We've always been being played.

We can stop playing.

.

i'd wanted a tugboat captain the most, but I get seasick

[click image]

.

Once again I am waaaaay behind in my New Yorker thing, waiting too long to get in bed, and I only seem to be doing my magazines in bed. Was hoping this wouldn't be only for subscribers, but there's an abstract there. The piece was so interesting because you only think of tugboats parking ships in harbors or hauling a barge from one side of a bay to the other. They do a heck of a lot more than that, and it's pretty darn Wild West stuff.

I used to gaze wistfully at them from the ferry on my way to work every morning....

.

23 July 2010

orwell

[click image, audio mp3, fifteen minutes]

.

Yes, Orwell.

.

19 July 2010

i don't trust germany or israel with this

[click image]

.

There were ancient masters who forbade their students to write down anything they said, but some did, covertly, anyway, and it has ended up helping future generations... while probably NOT helping the cheaters. There are many, many writers with the sense to burn the stuff they don't want surviving them BEFORE they check out. There are some who only say it on their deathbeds, knowing full well it will only goad their survivors the more to publish it. There are some unlucky stiffs who realize too late they're too feeble to do it themselves, or are killed before they can do it, and the world has to suffer the wreck of stuff they did not publish for very good reason. I don't know which of these applies. I just know I don't trust either country with the call. I especially dread Zionists—from wherever—whether the good-hearted kind or the sociopathological kind—having control over any translation of his stuff. It might take centuries to undo the harm that might be done.

It could become downright Kafkaesque.

.

02 July 2010

the good old days

[click image]

.

Rest your weary apocalypse....

.

21 June 2010

how about a spot of fiction?

[click image]

.

Take you out of your body....

.

21 May 2010

i think you're crazy

[click image]

.
My heroes had the heart to lose their lives out on a limb....
Ah, but why do I remember this? Why didn't I remain a child forever? Why didn't I die there, in one of those moments, preöccupied with the wiles of my schoolmates and the as-if-unexpected arrival of my schoolteachers?

Today I can't do this.... Today I have only reality, which I can't play with.... Poor little boy exiled in his manliness! Why did I have to grow up? Today, when I remember this, I feel nostalgia for other things besides all this. More in me than my past has died.


—transferred into cyberspace from a bit I tore from a magazine months ago
The cable guy came to fix my crazed intertubes connection... says they put a filter on my line because I'm not subscribed to the tv part and those filters wear out, start causing trouble. I told him that kind of filter is COMPLETELY unnecessary here because they couldn't PAY ME to watch their tv. He said his boss wouldn't let him do the sane thing.

I know. I know.
.

4:35pm — It's hailing again. Arctic wind and hail.
.

Watching a Philip K. Dick documentary....
.

16 May 2010

have a little more fiction

[click image]

.
It will take the edge off.

I added some links to the post about the Ferris short story in case you want to take more edge off.
.

i remember reading this story in the magazine

[click image, audio, 47 minutes — either I was too tired when I posted this and my eyes weren't working right, or I uploaded a middle version of the image I'd worked on to post instead of the end version... so if the image looks different to you now, well, that's because it is. Yet another thing that chuffs me about the feeds readers! I do so much work making the images go with this page. I'm never going to turn into a bastard Picasso on you, but, pfeh, you'll pardon me, I'm sure, if I continue to question the esthetic of your environment and what it does to your vitality and empathy, or lack thereof. Plus, the only way you will be getting this update and improvement is if you've come late to this post on your reader. I shudder to think of the partially-finished posts you have witnessed, never seeing the links added later and updates. I'm NOT going to sacrifice my spontaneity for posting the perfectly-polished every time. Maybe I will create a drafts blog and do more work before the posts hit this page, so you will get better out there, but STILL, pfeh, yuck. Those readers are UGLY. So I'm going to go right ahead and say the rest I had to say about this story, because you are, most probably, unable to know there's been any change.]

.
And I remember thinking how glad I was to have finished it, it being past tense, and then thinking how odd it was to have that thought, felt funny. I read short stories in that magazine every week, and rarely remember a one of them, and wouldn't have remembered this one, but for having had that funny, faintly luminous feeling at the very end of it over nothing I could discern at that moment. I thought the whole thing was a man who really adored his wife and wanted somehow to erase her regret and grief, didn't want her to think less of herself, wanted to be protective but not paternal, afraid her bitterness and obsession with unpredictability might yank her out of his life. So listening to these women discussing it, and going through the story again, I still say the gender-based agenda is just ugly, from either side. I mean, from the very start he didn't like her oldest friend precisely because she was not a good friend to her, competed with her, a boring snob and he was right. That seems to have escaped these two. I won't say more, in case you want to listen and express your own thoughts on the matter, but I feel these two professionals twisted this short story to suit some dim notion of feminism and missed the real depth of the piece.
.

Deborah Treisman and Monica Ali read Joshua Ferris’s “The Dinner Party” and discuss it at the image link... sort of like we did in school, expressing what we took away from the works and what we thought the author meant to convey and talking about the characters as though they were real people out there, out there in one of the billions of little worlds that make up the cosmos in which we walk around, pretending usually is just this life, just this little cell in the corner of our own minds and what it has let in as existent.

The protagonist here is just this guy, this unpretentious guy, who clearly just wants his life and friends and love and no pressures to be politically correct or politically astute. There's some famous or high socialite beauty at the party into which he stumbles later in the story, and he has no clue who she is, nor obviously does he particularly care. If you haven't gotten the picture that he's not interested in this sort of thing, but his wife IS, by this time in the story, the ending is going to lead you to prattle about marriages in trouble and postulate that he's a drunk, because he's had too much to drink this night.

He was drinking liberally because he was facing the specter of an evening with his wife's oldest friend and her husband. He does not like the friend because she competes with his wife instead of being her friend. This is extra hard for him because his wife is bitter about being barren and her snob friend is pregnant, and he's NOT looking forward to having this couple over to the impeccably-prepared gourmet dinner his wife is slaving to produce to impress her friend. He's drunkenly making up all this outrageous stuff to help release his wife from the pressure of the competition and the pain of her sense of loss and insufficiency from being unable to have children. He's expressing his solidarity with her, using that mode of tasteless statements he so enjoys about her... going probably overboard because he is increasingly sloshed.

Twice she points out he's no help. Once it is about his inability to make her pregnant, which both know is because she can't conceive. The next time it is about his refusal to enter into the game she calls her friendship, her social life, her desire to be different, superior, unpredictable, chic. Her friend is continually beating her out in these pursuits and it's always a while before she can calm down about it and revert to the friendly feeling again. And, this character flaw of hers keeps him frightened that she will just up and disappear on him one day.

This is revealed, or confirmed, when the protagonist is outside the snob friend's apartment being told off by her. She's a raving bitch, doesn't give a shit about her oldest friend and tries to blame him for that. He's just him. We are seeing throughout the story a guy who completely loves his wife of many years, whose sense of the marriage has not changed from the realization that they can't have kids, who wants his wife not to be so traumatized by it, so embittered by it, so whipped in the self-esteem department by it, wants to help her with that, show his solidarity with her, and she can't see it, is not comforted, does not connect, because she's been thrown into this role as defective and pitiable in a whole circle full of winners and her husband's complete lack of interest in that circle is no help to her sense of self-worth... because her sense of worthiness is based on superficial crap with superficial people... and he's outright incapable of going there, even for her sake... well because it wouldn't ACTUALLY be for her sake, now would it?

Deborah and Monica go on as though he is an alcoholic schlub who is a weight on his wife. It is clear in this story that he is drinking a lot this evening to be able to endure the visit with his wife's awful friends. It is clear that his wife is pissed off at him for getting so drunk when she's trying to pull off this perfect dinner party, and it's made the worse for her because she knows he's doing it to ward off the difficulty of a difficulty that is a difficulty for her in a different sense. It is also clear that the husband of his wife's friend is the alcoholic. Basically, his wife's friendship of so many years is at least equal parts competition and affection for her, while probably completely competition for the bitch who is late to her exquisite dinner. Our protagonist's wife would not have married a loser. She would have married someone her snob friends would be impressed by. So even though we never hear what he does, or who he is in the world, it's pretty obvious he's someone who's made a name for himself in art or letters or something snobs revere. The disappointment is that he isn't playing their game. Doesn't give a shit what celebrities they know, doesn't even follow who's a celebrity, and is abashed by his friend's apparent interest in this stuff.

These two seem to think that the couple times late in the story where he loses his focus, his sense of the here and now, mean he really is a drunk schlub, but it's the opposite. He's drunk that night and the difficulty with focus, the short trips into disorientation, are meant to show he isn't any good at drinking or at the society page. If this were about his alcoholism, he would have grabbed a drink at the bitch's apartment first thing instead of thinking later that it would have made him fit in better if he had grabbed a drink first thing, and he'd have resumed drinking when he got back home, or passed out, definitely not kept trying to deal with his wife's pain and anger and bitterness.

Deborah and Monica think he's the one who's bitter! OMG!

Sheesh. What planet are these people on?
.

Maybe they know perfectly well this is what the story is saying, but can't discuss it because dissing high society, in certain circles, in New York is simply not done. The actuality of this story being printed by The New Yorker is in fact far hipper than the celebrities whose attention ups one's social standing.
.

She's lonely in her marriage to him because she can't get him devolve back into that age-old keeping-up-with-the-Joneses thing, that life of posturing compensating for meaning.
.

Maybe you would prefer to read it...?

And another. No doubt about it, the guy's a good writer.
.

18 March 2010

bedtime stories

[click image]

.
I find them soothing....
.

14 December 2009

our criminal ownership

[click image, mp3, hour and a half]

.
Peter B interviews Nomi Prins and maybe you wanna give half a listen to keep grounded on just how bad this horseshit from our administration really is... and then some guy reads "poetry"... well... doggerel... progressive political doggerel.
.

29 November 2009

18 November 2009

purity

[click image]

The whole world have taken the wrong way, for they fear nonexistence, while it is their refuge. Where should we seek knowledge? In the abandonment of knowledge. Where should we seek peace? In abandoning peace. Where should we seek existence? In the abandonment of existence. Where should we seek apples? In abandoning our hands.